A few weeks ago I found myself trying to describe to an atheist what I feel about God. The atheist is a very, very smart man. An exceedingly talented writer, director and performer. He is also an absoluteist, in my estimation. He is fun to talk to, but sometimes can get so loud and smart and certain that I begin to feel like he's not really in it for the exchange but for the delivering. The conversation went to many places, including my feeling that atheists can be zealots on the same level as evangelical religious types. Atheists don't like it when I say that I feel atheism has become its own religion, that you can not merely point to the absence of A god, and the lie of THE god and sit back and say, "See, I've cured the human need for spiritual fufillment". I'm not here to tell you about that part of the conversation, though I'll expound on it if asked. The end of our discussion was when the atheist pointed to the dictionary definition of God when I suggested that I had formed my own meaning, my own relationship. He said because of the dictionary, (the atheist bible!!), (I am gonna get myself yelled at, I can tell), there is no room for discussion about the meaning of God. I have been thinking about this for weeks, I felt unfinished with him, and wanted to think more clearly about what I meant. Then tonight I wrote the entry before this, about love and hunger and sadness, and then had to write him an email, because I felt I had clarified something for myself. I have excerpted the email here, because I want to keep talking about this and finding my own way. It is as follows:
"I have been thinking constantly since you and I spoke at the party,
since I attempted to describe to you what I feel in my heart and soul is
my connection to God, and what it means to me. I wanted to say to you
that I have been bothered by your assertion that the dictionary
definition of God means that I can not develop my own idea of what God
is, my own feelings, because once the definition is set, there is no
longer room for growth. I can not accept this, as I can not accept that
there is no room for evolution and interpretation when it comes to
language and the poetics of the soul. I do not subscribe to the Bible
as truth, nor do I feel that the organizations of specific religions are
doing the world anything but harm, unless you are a fat rich white man,
then organized religion is totally your
friend! I do, however, feel a strong connection to the divine, to a
powerful force that is created by the collective energies of humans and
nature. It is, on a very large scale, much like the entity that is
created when two humans fall in love. The nurturing of that tender and
fragile relationship allows a third thing to be born, something alive
because of the two people loving each other, but also separate from
those two people, and available for them to draw strength from, but also
able to turn dark when not properly negotiated and tended to. I
hesitate to suggest symbiosis, because that isn't quite it, but
certainly the love can not exist without the humans, and the humans can
not rise up without the love.
I feel there are so many more
words for love that we have not even invented, because there are so many
kinds of love, and the same is true for God. We have defined it
narrowly, but it encompasses so much more than Oxford or Merriam-Webster
can describe. I will continue to use the word to find common ground
with other humans, to be a beginning of a life long conversation and
exploration. I do not think there is a single being that rules us all
and decides our fates and eternal dwelling place, but I think that all
humanity continually creates something together, a temperamental and
divine, humming consciousness that both gives and takes, can be
unpredictable though comforting, and which you can not always find, even
if you are looking, because it can also be petulant. Just like love.
I
have not written this in a draft after draft fashion, I'm just thinking
and talking. I believe language to be malleable, and love and God to be
ever searching for their own place in the lexicon."
That is what I wrote to him, but it just scratches the surface of what I mean, and leaves out the details of a lifetime of divine experiences and the reception of both destructive and inspiring energies from beyond myself. It is, perhaps, the continuing search that keeps me alive and breathing.
Love,
Riel
12.29.2013
But you're in love!
As if it can save you. As if the fragility of romantic love can withstand the cloying pressure of being the only source of happiness, of health. Trust me, it can not bear that kind of weight. Romantic love wants tender ministrations, it needs seeing to, watching over, particular and detailed negotiations. It can not thrive in darkness, it can not sustain when it is only drawn on and never replenished. It will be bled dry, left sere and cracked beyond repair. It is so temperamental, unpredictable, a river which alternately floods its banks and is reduced to a trickle, if there at all. There is no resting state, no compromise. It can not save you for it is always asking to be saved.
So, certainly, it has been wonderful to fall in love, it has even felt transformative along the way. But in the face of what I perceive to be irretrievable sadness in me, when all I desire is silence and stillness, the entity that we have created between us, that draws its own breath, it can not be asked to stop breathing, to put aside its own insatiable hungers and thirsts and look only outwards. It will always be greedy.
So, certainly, it has been wonderful to fall in love, it has even felt transformative along the way. But in the face of what I perceive to be irretrievable sadness in me, when all I desire is silence and stillness, the entity that we have created between us, that draws its own breath, it can not be asked to stop breathing, to put aside its own insatiable hungers and thirsts and look only outwards. It will always be greedy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)